Skip to content
- What big concerns did you have about your draft as you completed the first draft? One of the big concerns I had about my draft as I was completing it is the confusion I had about the paper in general. I still don’t really understand what exactly is being asked of us so it’s hard to write a solid draft/paper.
- What did your peers like most about your paper? Be specific, perhaps by quoting from one (or more) of the comments on your paper. Be sure to credit your peer! My peers seemed to like the opening statement of my paper the most.
- Where are you working best with Scheuer AND Ungar? What do your peers think you can do to improve on that section? You might quote from a peer, and give credit. I think that I’m working with Scheuer and Ungar the best throughout my paper. The only thing I need to improve on is adding more quotes and my own opinion along with their information
- Where are you working best with the Core Handbook? What do your peers think you can do to improve on that section? You might quote from a peer, and give credit.
- According to your peers, what are your two biggest challenges in your work with the texts? How do you think you can address those challenges in your revision? If you need quotes or “evidence,” be specific about the text you should bring into a revision. If you need stronger explanations of your relationships between Scheuer and Ungar, between Scheuer and the Core Handbook, or between Ungar and the Core Handbook, be specific about what you need to explain. (Don’t re-write the paragraphs or sections. Rather, explain what you need to do.)
- Using the guidance from your peers, put your key ideas about liberal arts and the UNE Core into a sentence or three. How will you help your reader “get” your perspective?
