Skip to content
- The main controversy that Carter is addressing an responding to is “professors typically learn to write in their disciplines not by any direct instruction but by a process of slow acculturation through various apprenticeship discourses, they are unable to see that writing itself is specific to the discipline. Consequently, faculty in the disciplines continue to conceive of writing as generalizable to all disciplines and therefore distinct from disciplinary knowledge, to be learned as a general skill outside the disciplines.”
- Carter describes genre as “… The kinds of writing faculty identified with these outcomes seem to support that argument: homework problems, case studies, essay test questions, literature reviews, an notated bibliographies, critical analyses, articles for newsletters, editorials, summaries-genres that cut across a wide range of disciplines”
- Carters concept of Metagenre is ” Though declarative knowledge is typically specific to individual disciplines and even to sub-disciplines, the procedural knowledge that faculty described tended to be more generic. And because individual academic programs also identified kinds of writing to be used both to teach and assess the outcomes, these patterns of doing were also linked explicitly to written genres.”
- responses to academic learning situations that call for prob Because the data set is limited to lem solving, for empirical inquiry, for research programs at my own university (a large, from sources, and for researches from sources, and for performances.”
